"Tax increase" called cost-push inflation

 According to the principle of GDP three-sided equivalence (production = expenditure = income), when the production (* value-added production) price rises, the income also increases.

 


The problem is that if the goods and services we spend are imported from abroad, the "domestic income" will not increase. In fact, imports are a deduction for GDP (Gross Domestic Product).



Imports increase the income of foreign producers. This means that even if the domestic inflation rate rises due to the influence of import prices, the "income of domestic producers" will not be affected.



Of course, in ordinary countries, the income of domestic producers is also rising, so there is no problem even if import prices rise a little.

 


On the other hand, in Japan, instead of increasing income, it is "decreasing", and cost-push inflation, in which only "income of foreign producers" rises, has begun. According to the principle of GDP three-sided equivalence (production = expenditure = income), when the production (* value-added production) price rises, the income also increases.

 


The problem is that if the goods and services we spend are imported from abroad, the "domestic income" will not increase. In fact, imports are a deduction for GDP (Gross Domestic Product).



Imports increase the income of foreign producers. This means that even if the domestic inflation rate rises due to the influence of import prices, the "income of domestic producers" will not be affected.



Of course, in ordinary countries, the income of domestic producers is also rising, so there is no problem even if import prices rise a little.

 


On the other hand, in Japan, instead of increasing income, it is "decreasing", and cost-push inflation, in which only "income of foreign producers" rises, has begun.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conflict over "facts"

 Last time, I talked about the difference between philosophy and science. In a word, philosophy explores the essence of the human "world of meaning". One science reveals the mechanism of the "world of facts". Contrary to what many believe, the "world of meaning" actually precedes the "world of facts". There is an objective "world of facts", and humans do not attach "meaning" to it. On the contrary, the "world of facts" can exist for us only when we are caught in the antenna of our "world of meaning". In that sense, philosophy supports science from its roots. Unless we understand the essence of the "world of meaning," we cannot know the "world of facts" in depth. Conflict over "facts" However, science usually does not have to think about such troublesome things. For the time being, all of us recognize (believe) that things will fall if we let go, or that the earth is orbiting th
Read more

How do you live now?

 Philosophical words are like vaccinations. Occasionally, I think about that. I feel that it is not a clever word that penetrates the body like a bullet, but a word that gradually spreads throughout the body without knowing it. "Philosophy life counseling" is not such a bad thing, but I think it would be nice if I could spun such a word like a vaccine below. It may not always have immediate effect. But in the long run, I'm sure that your immunity will be improved, and I hope that you will have such a life consultation. This time, the first time, we will answer four consultations. 1. 1. What on earth am I living now !? @Masaki Why do we live when we die anyway? @ Milk green juice The 19th century German philosopher Nietzsche said this (a little erratic). There is no ready-made correct answer in the meaning of living. Create it yourself!  When. The meaning of life is not something that is "preliminarily" rolling somewhere in the sky beyond the mountains, in the ho
Read more